The student community, the young and energetic, a bundle of flammable material that the touch screen is a spark ignites a big uncontrolled fire as a forest fire. The fact that young people do not have patience, lively and malleable.
In India, the trend of students actively involved in politics began in the early 20th century, when India was fighting for his freedom. The elders are busy as the breadwinner, actively encouraging young people to enter the arena of politics. Besides, they were young and easily enthused to join the mass movement of the drop of a hat. The political parties then began mobilizing young students who happily organized to help one party or the other. This trend began in the early years of the 20th century and continues even expanded up to date.
However, when independence was won was to be reviewed if it should be possible for the students or encouraged to enter politics. Some sections of society just started to believe that students should stay away from politics and keep their own study schedules only. While the society held its debate on this issue, the politicians took the work of a younger generation of energy-cum tanks and involvement of students in politics it came to stay.
The current scenario in India is therefore a sharp struggle for political parties engaged in enlisting the support of students. This obviously results in students becoming sharply divided, as if this political party or that is so, even in the campus elections will be spoiled, a little politics.
There is of course nothing advantages and disadvantages, so it's not the involvement of students in politics. There are also serious disadvantages and some advantages to the students that the focus of the policy. Cons outnumber the advantages. First, while the students to get into college primarily studies distracted the main goal, and entangled in the dirty game of politics. The energy and time they use or waste of masterminding policy measures, could be used to study. This entry was posted policy at the premises of educational institutions caused a lot of damage to more students. The students have been accustomed since rusticated active participation in political life, thus losing their influence studies. Politics teaches students to put an end to all the rules and become rowdy and violent.
This leads to the closure of institutions, students pay again & # 39; learning time. A very loving and innocent appearance of children are lost and they become rude, arrogant and disobedient. If there are too many entry-hooliganism educational institutions, and even the police to be called, and sometimes there is complete disruption of the campus, and even the bullets find their way among the students. The disadvantages of entering students in a number of policy and destructive.
If we study the advantages of this system exist, but very little, hardly significant. Children entering the arena of politics learn the art of public speaking. They learn to be assertive and persuasive. This medium is a good step in the artistic leadership. The importance and real benefit is that the students in these prime years of life gained a lot of knowledge of the policy, which provides them with training in the arena, skilled politicians. After
study of the pros and cons of the students & # 39; participation in political life, the disadvantages damaging than the profits earned in the series. For all the benefits of student income, it can also be achieved in other ways, and there is no need to force their entry into politics.
Students must stay away from politics and keep their interest in studies, which alone can help them steer the ships of their lives.