โรนัลโด้ยืนยันไม่มีความขัดแย้งกับเมสซี่

Published by:

ข่าวฟุตบอล

ยังรักกันเหมือนเดิม! คริสเตียโน่ โรนัลโด้ ปีกจอมกระชากของทัพ “ปีศาจแดง” ได้ออกมายืนยันแล้วว่า ตนเอไม่ได้มีความขัดแย้งใดๆกับ ลิโอเนล เมสซี่ กองกน้าตัวอันตรายของทัพ “เจ้าบุญทุ่ม” เลยแม้แต่น้อย พร้อมทั้งตำหนิสื่อ ชอบสร้างกระแสว่าตนเองมีความบาดหมางกับแข้งทีมชาติอาร์เจนติน่า

คริสเตียโน่ โรนัลโด้ ตัวริมเส้นจอมพลิ้มของ เรอัล มาดริด ยอดสโมสรสุดแกร่งแห่งแดนกระทิงดุ ได้ออกมาประกาศเสียงดังฟังชัดแล้วว่า ตนเองกับ ลิโอเนล เมสซี่ ศูนย์หน้าพรสวรรค์สูงของ บาร์เซโลน่า ยังมีความสัมธ์ที่ดีต่อกันเหมือนเดิม ถึงแม้จะมีกระแสข่าวออกมาว่า ตนเองกับแข้งรานี้มีปัญหาความไม่ลงรอยกันกก็ตาม

คริสเตียโน่ โรนัลโด้ และ ลิโอเนล เมสซี่ ซุปเปอร์สตาร์ทั้งสองรายนี้ ได้รับการสรรเสิญว่าเป็นผูเล่นที่เก่งที่สุดแห่งวงการลูกหนัง ซึ่งมักจะมีคำถามเกิดขึ้นมาตลอดว่า แข้งทั้งสองรายนี้ใครมีฝีเท้าที่ยอดเยี่ยมกว่ากัน และเหล่าบรรดาแฟนคลับทั้งหลายของแข้งทั้ง 2 คนนี้ ก็มักจะมีปัญหากันอยู่บ่อยครั้งสำหรับเรื่องนี้

กัปตันทีมชาติโปรตุเกศได้ออกมาให้สัมภาษณ์ถึงเรื่องนี้ไว้ว่า “เราไม่เคยมีความขัดแย้ง กันเลยแม้แต่น้อย เรายังคงมีความสัมพันธ์ที่ดีต่อกันเหมือนเดิม สื่อชอบออกมาปล่อยข่าวว่าเราทั้งสองไม่ค่อยชอบขี้หน้ากันเท่าไร ซึ่งผมขอยืนยันเลยว่า มันไม่เป็นความจริงแต่อย่างใด ถึงแม้ว่าเราจะถูกเอาไปเปรียบเทียบ ว่าใครเก่งกว่ากันอยู่บ่อยครั้งก็ตาม”

 

The Politics Of Animal Stories – Chinua Achebe

Published by:

The work we & # 39 ;, Got References to do with it & # 39; Achebe creates a very substantial literature on the issue of creation. He asks that the & # 39; People create stories & # 39; or & # 39; create stories of people & # 39; or more & # 39; stories create people create stories & # 39;. When asked how the story come first, and people come to you first connect to the creation of the myth, which is connected to a worthy Fulani & # 39; s story. & # 39; This is the story of a creature that man was created in the first or the story was first. The story goes that it was the beginning of a & # 39; a huge drop of milk. Then the milk is created stones, fire up the stone; The fire created water; The water created air & # 39;. Then people Doondari formed by the five elements. But the man was pride. Then Doondari created blindness and blindness defeated man. The story is about creation, lost people, hubris and redemption of man. These stories are not just limited to the creation, but we absorbed the history of the people, social organizations, political systems and moral behavior, religious, and even prejudices.

The Igbo political system prevails in the absence of kings. The word & # 39; King & # 39; It represents the number of different words. The town of Ogidi Igobo kingdom gradually going out of use, because the king had to settle for a lot of debt, all men and women belonging to the kingdom. In fact, he became king held a total contempt for the people, when they organized a ritual known as & # 39; Kola nut & # 39; which cracked the nut between his teeth and made people eat the cola-nut covered with the King & # 39; s saliva. He dethroned, and people are Republican. They decided the king should guarantee the solvency of the people. These mythical stories of the kingdom diminished the appearance of the British community in the United Kingdom when the British political heritage and acquired new connotations.

Achebe story mentions two animals emergence of the British community in the United Kingdom when the British political heritage and acquired new connotations.

Achebe story mentions two animals, which is shorter, but complex enough to warrant their literature. I once had a meeting with the animals, a public square, where a winged neighbors spotted going in the opposite direction. The winged explains that the meeting did not go because of something personal. The winged generously said that although he was not present in the body would be present in spirit. It was decided at the meeting that a particular animal, that is, the wing would now regularly sacrificed to the gods. And so the wing consented to sacrifice forever.

The second story of a pet snake riding. The snake did not ride very skillfully. A toad came to show the snake rider. The toad was riding very cleverly, and came back and returned the horse to the snake. The snake smiled and said it was better, which is like no. He was in possession of the horse. So he rode the horse the same way as before.

This is the story of two strange consequences. The story of a winged fairy-tale warning democratic citizens who are not actively involved in the democratic process. The second story is from the class divide. The snake of an aristocratic class society as a toad with a commoner expertise whose personal effort does not matter, because they do not have the required assets. The snake has merit, birth or wealth, and thus enjoys the privileges that he has a skill or not.

The relationship between implicit literary stories. Literature offers the possibility of social transformation and change. Literature may cause a change in the society. Enforcement of the king's subjects to eat nuts for saliva apparently invited to rebellion. The snake story is also a story of privilege and class division, but the seeds of revolution. The expert should not be encouraged to rise unjustified privilege of observing the rebellion unskilled rich. The consequence of such a break-up of an incompetent oligarchy. In fact, the shape of the snake has been selected as a nuisance because in the end it will be the goal of the revolution.

literature related to the social, economic and educational growth. Literature related to the creation of human societies. Since Nigeria wants to grow as an independent nation, it is necessary to support national stories of creative energy and maintain the growth of the nation.

Moreover, even if we look back at the classic literature, you can see that the portrayal of Achilles or Odysseus, directly linked to the growth in Greece as a nation. So the portrait of Beowulf is linked to the social, historical and national development in the Anglo-Saxon society. Is there any relationship between the Anglo-Saxons sitting around the fire in the fireplace rebel against the cold and charting their growth and psychoanalysis storytelling. Both psychological implications in them. When one tells a story that really tells a story of a psychoanalyst. The relationship between literature and psychoanalysis Achebe puts it & # 39; Literature is an important and profound positive effect as well, it works as a kind of hearty, nutritious matrix of healthy growing populations. & # 39; Literature helps offset the psyche of life helps the discovery of myself, tables cope with life. Literature is the symbol of the animal story itself bound by political uprisings, sociological and historical analysis and psychoanalytic self growths that helps confronting reality and finding a & # 39; and himself.

Source by Anuradha Basu

Do not Mass Media influence political behavior of citizens

Published by:

Outside the university environment, a rough and seemingly growing debate appeared that the mass media distorts the political agenda to it. Few would argue with the idea that the institutions of the mass media is important in contemporary politics. The transition to liberal democratic politics in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, the media is a key battleground. Elections in the West getting around television, with an emphasis on spin and marketing. Democratic policy places great emphasis on the media at the scene of a democratic demand and the formation of "public opinion". The media shows that the public and government attention and securing redress. Yet the media are not only neutral observers, but political actors themselves. The interaction with mass media and political figures – politicians, interest groups, strategists and others who play an important role – the political process is obvious. In this context, the US political scene could be described as a dynamic environment in which to communicate, especially all forms of journalism, fundamentally affect and influence.

According to the theory of democracy, the people rule. The pluralism of the various political parties to ensure the parties 'alternative', and if and when one party loses the confidence they support each other. The democratic principle of "government of the people by the people and for the people" would be nice if it's all so simple. But a medium-large, modern state, things are not quite so. Today, many elements contribute to the development of the state & # 39; s political discourse, including the goals and success of the strategies used by public relations and advertising politically engaged persons and the growing influence of new media technologies such as the Internet.

The naive assumption of liberal democracy to its citizens adequate knowledge of political events. But how citizens acquire the necessary information and knowledge, and to use their votes other than blind guesses? They can not possibly witness everything that happens on the national scene, much less the level of world events. The vast majority of students are not in politics. I do not really know what is happening, and if it did it would need guidance on how to interpret what they know. Since the beginning of the twentieth century, it has been fulfilled through the mass media. There is little the United States can say today that does not have access to at least one form of media, even the very low political knowledge. Although the political information is by no proliferation, which is supported by the mass media in different critics that the events are designed and packaged, are constructed framework, political actors and the media between politicians and the Information bar, and ownership effects important short hand cue, how to interpret and understand the news.

must not forget another interesting fact in the media. Political influence goes far beyond current affairs magazine articles and objects directly political nature or related to television programs that are borne by the policy. they can influence it in a more subtle way people & # 39; and thought patterns in other ways, such as "goodwill" stories, pages dealing with entertainment and popular culture, movies, TV "soaps", "education" programs. All these types of information are human values, concepts of good and evil, right and wrong, sense and nonsense, what is "fashionable" and "unfashionable" and what is "acceptable" and "unacceptable". These human values ​​in turn shaped by the people & # 39; s conduct of policy issues and influence how you vote, and therefore, a political power.

Source by Jonathon Hardcastle

The Politics Of The American Dream

Published by:

The American Dream is the promise to have it all and enjoy it all. It & # 39; and glorified and sentimentalized as a utopian goal not just by the media and Hollywood stars, but also for businesses and politicians, including the president of the United States. In reality, however, the American dream is becoming more and more like the & # 39; It's impossible dream. & # 39; Today, many Americans think that the odds of winning the lottery are better than pursued the American dream.

Originally, the demand for the American Dream concept was born, and the lack of genuine security shortly after the Great Depression and WW2. For some jobs, the greatest aspiration for most Americans was to ensure steady employment and owning your own home. As a result, the work ethic and integrity were very strong. The focus of a healthy value system, the family and the community, all of which created pride, real prosperity and joy. Over time, however, the same as being from being a nation of producers, also created a nation of consumers, not the compression needed, but also the desire of the & # 39; keep up with the Jones & # 39; s. & # 39;

Today, the American Dream is more of a marketing concept that Madison Avenue and the government are equally convinced people that have to have a certain standard of living (such as a second home, a vacation in Europe, expensive jewelry and other & # 39; toys & # 39;), in order to be happy and fulfilled. Even the Christmas holiday has lost its original meaning and has become very commercialized.

In other words, we & # 39; ve been brainwashed to believe that & # 39; He lives most of the game, & # 39; instead of & # 39; He lives in the most joy. & # 39; By having a greater amount of personal debt, Americans are more stressed and less optimistic and fulfilled than ever, despite a high standard of living. It & # 39; and it & # 39; games & # 39; (Material goods), without purpose and healthy value system can only produce artificial joy that is as fleeting it is cruel.

The American dream, as we know, is not something that is born of necessity and miss, but greed and desire. Therefore, it does not represent the true spirit of America, which is based on perspiration, innovation, focus on the risks and benefits of a healthy value system, the integrity of the family, the community and a strong work ethic.

From Enron economy and huge government deficits, our failing that, the education system and the break down of the family system (where the kids stay home to live up to their peers, gangs and TV alone), virtually every aspect of our lives negatively affected by the pursuit of materialism, which is a by-product of the American dream. In a materialistic-driven society where there is an obsession with fame and fortune and winning at all costs, the accepted view is that we & # 39; s politically correct and do not do what you & # 39; and the interests of the community. And when the intoxicating power of love overcomes the love of power, that & # 39; It s easy to see why the absolute power corrupts absolutely.

The concept of the American Dream (as we know it now) is not just a marketing concept, but it is also used more and more votes and keeping constituents happy by politicians. The cut-throat world of politics where the stakes are high, driven by their own self-serving agendas of politicians. As such, the various political parties own agenda when some members of the society to help achieve the American dream. The Democratic Party of supporting the unions and union contracts that high wage increases in the common worker so that you can achieve a piece of the American dream. In doing so, guarantee work and wages, people who are not necessarily that productive, at the expense of everyone else. On the other hand, the Republican party believes philosophically in the free enterprise system. The idea is that an economic system that rewards primarily people who are successful, which means mostly wealthy people at the expense of everyone else.

In other words, all the political parties and special interest groups who contribute to election campaigns are trying to achieve a political version of the American dream constituencies at the expense of everyone else. Ironically, both political parties realize that because the pie is limited, making the American dream come true Americans become virtually impossible. In fact, most people consider to perpetual debt their whole lives to maintain a standard of living in accordance with the new ideal of the American Dream. It & # 39; and this unattainable dream that drives both parents are working longer and harder at work than ever before, which contributes to the ills of society.

Thus, in order to be possible the American dream than many Americans achieve consumer had to be created. The point of consumption is that people spend more money going into debt. The logic is that higher spending produces wealth for some people. The problem is that there is a limit to how far one can go in debt. Finally, the economy is becoming more & # 39; cards & # 39; You will not be able to create & # 39; value jobs, & # 39; (The production, creation and production). Instead, jobs are in the service sector, catering to the insatiable need to consume. Eventually this type of faulty economy will result in financial chaos where institutions, banks and even governments do not, as we & # 39; I saw what & # 39; happening in California.

The pursuit of pleasure and avoidance of pain, we & # 39; It has long been looking for solutions and fulfillment in the wrong place. The solution is to restore the economy, we are failing in our institutions and systems, as well as your sanity through the soul. It & # 39; and because whether we realize it or not, we are spiritual beings experiencing the human experience and not the other way around. As such, what was the purpose and goal is to live a life meaning and purpose in recognizing the unity and harmony of life living in the universal laws that are characterized by integrity and respect for all living beings. Total prosperity and peace depend on the strength of spirit.

Only if you & # 39; Regions & # 39; type of politics is replaced by business integrity (where the power of love overcomes the love of power) hope to make a meaningful and lasting changes & # 39; and also cost effective. Maybe if we live the mantra that & # 39; he is the most joy of life & # 39; instead of & # 39; He lives most of the game, & # 39; knowing that Paradise is not so much a place but a state of mind, we can once again appreciate the simple pleasures in life while recognizing that indeed the best things in life are free. Now that you & # 39; s the real thing, unlike the Coca-Cola claims to have.

And while most of us may not be Lords of the Rings, we are always masters of their own destiny on earth. Simply put, we all have the power to create our own destiny personal responsibility no matter what we & # 39; ve been brainwashed to believe. Perhaps you back to our spiritual roots, and understand the unity of life, we finally realize that we are all connected in the web of life that whatever effects a direct impact on all of us indirectly (the global economy perfectly illustrates this fact). Perhaps then confrontation will give way to cooperation and destruction will be replaced with construction. Only then will we experience that peace is not so much unity similarities, but also the unity in diversity – a diversity that must be celebrated. Perhaps we realize that we are all children of God, they will also learn to respect life, and finally there is a genuine and lasting peace and harmony, which will inevitably lead to total prosperity for all is a win-win spirit. Now that you & # 39; s something to sing.

Source by

The pendulum effect in American politics: 1974-2010

Published by:

One of my favorite movie quotes Back to the Future, Christopher Lloyd as Doc Brown, questioning Michael J. Fox & # 39; Marty McFly's 1955 time-travel story is absurd prove designate the president in 1985. When Marty replied, "Ronald Reagan" Doc Brown yells and says, incredulous "Ronald Reagan, the actor? Ha!"

Before the 1980 presidential election, many Americans are of the same opinion as the good doctor. Jimmy Carter & # 39; s presidency has weakened the Iranian hostage crisis, a stubborn recession and the second energy crisis of the decade, but the conventional wisdom after the primer has been to GOP candidate Ronald Reagan was not a prayer. However, the fact, however, was defiant in support of pious religious, fast-growing and well-financed "New Right". When this movement helped steer the Reagan White House, their influence continued to shape American policy and politics a dozen years ago. The pendulum has swung dramatically to the right. Progressives and moderates were shocked. Back to the future, indeed.

But those who were not shocked short memories or too young to remember another dramatic swing – left – a result of the Watergate scandal. The resignation of President Nixon on August 8, 1974, two years before the "national nightmare" and the birth of outright investigative journalism, has led to a deep and lasting distrust of the government to the press and the public. This collective rejection of presidential arrogance, coupled with outrage Ford & # 39; Nixon's pardon, propelled an army of freshly minted Democrats (including Jimmy Carter) in Washington.

Let & # 39; s return to the much-talked Reagan Revolution. Characterized trickle-down economics, which has mysteriously escaped during the final stop of the promised beneficiaries began to dim President George HW Bush. While the criminal proceedings, the Gulf War is usually met with a high score, Bush & # 39; s tin ear toward recession & # 39; early 90-ies became the undoing. The smart and charismatic Bill Clinton wrested away from the Republicans for the first time in twelve years. While Clinton ushered in the era of the "New Democrat", which rejected a liberal policy of the party & # 39; s past, the pendulum is undeniably been turned back to the left.

Two short years later, Newsweek ran a cover article embattled Clinton is accompanied by the title of "The Incredible Shrinking President." He limped out of the gate spanning the worthy but narrow issue of gays in the military, resulting in the "Do not ask, do not tell" policy has been unpopular on all sides. Most critical, this is a dangerous distraction from the average voter & # 39; s primary question: ". it & # 39; s the economy, stupid" immortal words of James Carville, Enter (stage right) coals Newt Gingrich, taking over the contract America and the GOP both houses of the mid-term elections in 1994. The future looked bleak for New Democrats.

reports of the demise, of course, greatly exaggerated. Two years later, Clinton & # 39; and serendipity was personified GOP presidential candidate Sen. Bob Dole. Dole & # 39; s laconic style and lukewarm campaign skills made it possible prosecution president who barely survived the seismic sex scandal to win the election decisively. He is a major contributor to the rising hubris Republicans who mistakenly believed in the absolute power and significantly underestimated the anger of the American public when you shut down the federal government. Notorious impasse provided the perfect foil for Clinton, and it may be a lesson in the benefits of the enemy is going wrong.

The decision of the Supreme Court in 2000 vs. Bush more conservative bench was taken by Gore, effectively shifted the country back on the right side. It remained in the 11/09, two world wars, unprecedented economic trajectory and a dizzying plummet to the ground. Bush & # 39; Based on the approval and went down almost as quickly, the infection has spread to GOP candidate John McCain. Suddenly the boom years of the mid-2000s, it became the worst economy since the Great Depression. It was fertile ground for Barack Obama, a relative newcomer to the national scene, who unseated first hitherto presumed Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton. Obama then shake the soul of the nation – and the wrath of his opponents – the redemptive power of evangelical hope. Advanced rejoiced as the Americans accepted his promise of change.

Mario Cuomo once noted, probably from personal experience that politicians campaign in poetry but govern prose. The Obama administration is a Herculean task to blame the economy, rising unemployment and a desperately dysfunctional health care system both in the first eighteen months. Ambitious? Daring? Recipe for a path to the middle term? Perhaps all. The rise of the Tea Party has fueled the raging opposition to the bank bailouts, tarp, and "Obamacare." This is no small irony, the first two of Bush & # 39; s hour, a soon forgotten because of an acute case of national amnesia. Blamed for anemic incentive and entrenched unemployment, nearly 10% of Democrats "took a shellacking" in the mid-2010s perspective. Twenty-four months after the Obama & # 39; s historic victory, The Economist & # 39; s post-election issue published a picture of the upcoming wine ". The Republicans ride"

The ebb and American policy is not contrary to the old adage of the New England weather: if you do not like it, wait five minutes. Reagan & # 39; he and Clinton & # 39; Based on the approval of both lower and that Obama & # 39; s previous two years re-election. Clinton, Truman and Eisenhower all suffered similar losses in mid-term and re-elected in their childbearing years. If history prologue, and the pendulum is activated, you can still hope for Obama in 2012

Source by Loretta Ernst

Students and Politics – The Indian Scenario

Published by:

The student community, the young and energetic, a bundle of flammable material that the touch screen is a spark ignites a big uncontrolled fire as a forest fire. The fact that young people do not have patience, lively and malleable.

In India, the trend of students actively involved in politics began in the early 20th century, when India was fighting for his freedom. The elders are busy as the breadwinner, actively encouraging young people to enter the arena of politics. Besides, they were young and easily enthused to join the mass movement of the drop of a hat. The political parties then began mobilizing young students who happily organized to help one party or the other. This trend began in the early years of the 20th century and continues even expanded up to date.

However, when independence was won was to be reviewed if it should be possible for the students or encouraged to enter politics. Some sections of society just started to believe that students should stay away from politics and keep their own study schedules only. While the society held its debate on this issue, the politicians took the work of a younger generation of energy-cum tanks and involvement of students in politics it came to stay.

The current scenario in India is therefore a sharp struggle for political parties engaged in enlisting the support of students. This obviously results in students becoming sharply divided, as if this political party or that is so, even in the campus elections will be spoiled, a little politics.

There is of course nothing advantages and disadvantages, so it's not the involvement of students in politics. There are also serious disadvantages and some advantages to the students that the focus of the policy. Cons outnumber the advantages. First, while the students to get into college primarily studies distracted the main goal, and entangled in the dirty game of politics. The energy and time they use or waste of masterminding policy measures, could be used to study. This entry was posted policy at the premises of educational institutions caused a lot of damage to more students. The students have been accustomed since rusticated active participation in political life, thus losing their influence studies. Politics teaches students to put an end to all the rules and become rowdy and violent.

This leads to the closure of institutions, students pay again & # 39; learning time. A very loving and innocent appearance of children are lost and they become rude, arrogant and disobedient. If there are too many entry-hooliganism educational institutions, and even the police to be called, and sometimes there is complete disruption of the campus, and even the bullets find their way among the students. The disadvantages of entering students in a number of policy and destructive.

If we study the advantages of this system exist, but very little, hardly significant. Children entering the arena of politics learn the art of public speaking. They learn to be assertive and persuasive. This medium is a good step in the artistic leadership. The importance and real benefit is that the students in these prime years of life gained a lot of knowledge of the policy, which provides them with training in the arena, skilled politicians. After

study of the pros and cons of the students & # 39; participation in political life, the disadvantages damaging than the profits earned in the series. For all the benefits of student income, it can also be achieved in other ways, and there is no need to force their entry into politics.
Students must stay away from politics and keep their interest in studies, which alone can help them steer the ships of their lives.

Source by Arun K

Today & # 39; Policy and Society

Published by:

Today & # 39; s political climate, and what many of the destruction and demise of our Constitution, it is relatively easy to lose it in a cool, becoming coarse and offensive rhetoric, forums and exchanges. Yes, I committed myself to this behavior. I must admit during my caustic outburst I thought it was a good feeling, and rather smug my return, only to realize later I had lost the battle and not only lost, but I felt, caused enormous disappointment of how I lost it.

lose a debate on the merits is one thing to lose due to sour, name calling, foul language is inexcusable. At this stage of the game, I make a point to not use vulgarity reach out to them to find the exact name of the persons, and to ensure that the correct address of the office, especially those with whom I am in total disagreement. We have seen and heard the leader of the Senate, Mr. Reid calling citizens who are using the constitutional right as the terrorists. Too often members use offensive language to intimidate those in the political class who oppose them and spew rhetoric that blatant thuggish behavior.

As an example, always read President Obama Obama. In my opinion, the presidency is the highest office in the country; the most powerful nation in the world, and this is the office that demands my respect. I happen to agree fully with the President most of Obama & # 39; s policies and do not respect the public administration. He said that when they argue that this is not a substantive president rhetorical offensive policies related to creating fodder for opponents, and the message I hoped to convey gets lost in the response to my earthiness.

Some people are particularly on the left side, darling, you can say that will change their opinion. As we have all come to realize double standards abound in the liberal left. At least when I leave or finish the criticism, I may not have won the argument, but the honor is intact, it is a solid, good feeling.

Who knows, your opponent can give a second thought (and thus replay in my opinion) is how conservatives, Keepers of the Constitution, behave debate. (I have to admit, sometimes it's a huge challenge to zip my lips.) Therefore, my fellow Patriots, then I suggest that the high ground. Also keep in mind; it is important to remember to VOTE use it wisely.

Source by Jacquie Hurlbut

Build Your Business – Are Politics and peace-building are mutually exclusive?

Published by:

It is easy to assume that all politics and peacemaking can be mutually exclusive. The truth is that there are many situations that, in order to keep the peace, be involved in politics, or even in the way. If there is a dispute rare interests, regardless of whether they take control, power or leadership to the policy. God teaches us how "should be" if we are His children. As human beings created by God, they are asked to take photos of the Father. With our peace with ourselves and others.

There are many organizations, there are internal conflicts and even key leaders start to make their case and use politics, we hope to be up to the peace or put an end to what they believe disturbs the peace of mind. Vice-flexing threaten other departments need to control these units are not as they say. When you talk about politics, discuss the policies and procedures which raised controversy. These same policies dictate the path towards peacemaking as a social whole. But it is also important to note that it also brings further conflict within the group, and so another option for peacemaking. We look at what happened in Ireland in 1997.

"In August 1997, less than a month after the second cease-fire took hold in Northern Ireland, thousands of Protestant pastors and lay leaders gathered in Belfast to one of the historic public commitment peacemaking Protestants and Roman Catholics.

Michael Cassidy, the South African evangelical influential producing open elections and an end to apartheid in South Africa, He challenged them to a new level of personal responsibility in bringing about reconciliation and tolerance. nearly two-thirds of his invitation in 3000 in the audience stood up to indicate the pledge to peacemaking. At the beginning of this year, the Anglican Church of Ireland took similar steps, when the general Synod voted to condemn the presence of sectarian views within the denomination and to conduct an inquiry to determine how serious the problem "(Morgan, 1997).

Without a policy that was not taken further steps to really determine what the problem is and rededicate themselves towards peace. But there are other examples where politics and peacemaking are not mutually exclusive. Take for example the military. Leaders war with other countries that have different political views than ours. We are sent to war by force. And only the winner can then determine what we believe to be peace. Who war we fight? The definition of which we achieve peace? Ours, the people of other nations?

Source by Paul Resurreccion

policy and Politrics governance

Published by:

The shepherds take care of the sheep, feed and protect them, so that we, human beings, as a nation, need a leader who can take care of us the resources, nation and environment with which we can live peacefully and enjoy our lives. I always get nervous when I hear of a nation suffering because of poor leadership, and it interested me to write about this subject.

Politics is a very broad term and is the art or science of government or governing, especially the governing political entity, such as a nation, and the management and control of internal and external affairs. However, the policy now, it seems that the act of dictating to others, in other words, the plot is complicated by & # 39; s own thoughts and believe others did not fulfill his promise, and fraud and misleading the innocent citizens. On the other hand, politrics up the activities of politicians to fool the public into believing that care for them and be accountable for them. These activities include, that these "impostors" appears during campaigns and when they are in power. The actions and work of these "con artists" seem to be the opposite of what they promise to citizens before they came to power. If a group of person or persons is / are able to produce these effects to man or society, political power is obtained. This power is gained election.

When a political group wants to have the power of choice, it has to cheat promises to be easy to deceive the innocent people fall victim to. The campaign messages of these people sound like a melody that is easy to draw attention to, and I & # 39; s ability to deceive people to vote for them it is called the "seat of wealth". If they are at this meeting about the environmental conditions seem to increase their chances of forgetfulness; that allow them to forget the promises they made. Ray Davies with his song, money and corruption, he said that "Money and corruption are ruining the land, crooked politicians betray the working man, pocketing the profits and treat us like sheep, and we & # 39; tired of learning We promise that we know that it & # 39 never fails "(1973). Because money and wealth, these politicians used to obtain "ways and means" Campaigns to power and refuses to think about the people and what they promised. This is not surprising, "promises" phrases now in everyday use, journalists and opinion polls to describe these promises.

There have been several cases around the world promises, acknowledge and even unnoticed as well. You will agree with me if you & # 39; ve taken the campaign messages of the presidents in the last few years and promises are fulfilled. I would like to reflect back on the past and the question of the political system and leadership, little can compare with that you mention here and you might not know much about the differences.

In 2000 the US presidential election, George W. Bush, the then-candidate election, said: "Congress push and push … I & # 39; ll say Read my lips: no new taxes will be" . How sweet it sounds, this message! and it was enough to push him to power, but he could not keep this promise and abandoned a balanced budget when they voted in favor of performance. 2003 provincial elections in Ontario, Canada, the Liberal Party promised to reduce taxes, but came to power after raising taxes.

politricks They seem to have a genetic disease that is inherited from one president to another with the help of environmental factors such as greed, infidelity; They can call them even though these people are not related biologically. It is not uncommon nowadays to find on the Internet, you can hear in the media and other sources, "Obama's Broken Promises." Many promised him yet unfulfilled. These are just a few examples, and I bet that we & # 39; ve been several such cases in different local communities, as indicated, or ignored. Not only are these leaders to break their promises, but also to take advantage of their positions to loot public property. This makes politics a game.

Politics is like a draft of the game that politicians and innocent citizens who do not worry too much about a lot of the tricks of the game. Politicians use the country's draft board and trick the opponent, the people in the country to a dumb move, so take advantage of it and grab all the pieces of the game that they are winners. Politicians play a clueless innocent citizens and depriving them of the so-called "national cake" and that their personal well-being. This greed led to many crises in the world where some countries are facing an economic crisis, but its leaders making tons of riches. It does not conceal the imagination of a great man, Abraham Lincoln, who said one of the quotes "I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves that shake me from the safety of my country" (1864). Abraham Lincoln was because when I think that our leaders looting of state property and "ordinary people" struggling to find their daily bread, which made me cry. During these two countries in trouble for drivers who do not think about the welfare of the people, but rather their own "pockets". Below I have highlighted a few examples.

Post a web site in Nigeria Emmanuel soaking in the 2009 defense budget, Nigeria, it shows that the then Minister of Foreign Affairs, Chief Ojo Madoekwe, his foreign trips in 2009 spent N2.7 billion. Chairman of the Senate Foreign Affairs, Jibril Aminu, who chaired a meeting of the defense budget presented by the Minister of N2.7 billion on the "economic waste." (Nigeria Politics, 2009). It is interesting that these issues that these politicians are sometimes not able to be informed of the fact that these funds were used when accountability. This money and the conversion of resources, the country has a huge amount of money spent on only one minister travels. I'm starting to ask myself, how much will it be the Minister of prey, if other areas such as the oil sector, added to his task ?. There is no doubt that he is that billions of money from public funds, while the living conditions of citizens, not the best.

Another sad incident occurred in my country, Ghana in 2009 CHAN (Home-based African Nations Cup) final between Ghana and Benin in Abidjan, Cote d & # 39; Voir. They were the then Youth and Sports, Hon Muntaka Muhammed with abuse allegations against the country & # 39th; s money and corruption. Laboratory studies have shown that against National Security in this case, signed by the minister accused the presidential spokesman Mahama Ayariga showed the minister paid a refund GHC 15200.00 meat and food products. (ILoveAfrica, blogspot). I think if the whole country has gone this way you will not spend money that approximates around $ 7,600.00 in a final way.

It reminds me of a story I heard a young age that he was a man who, after eating, the food digest only pass through the digestive tract without coming out and the anus. This man can eat the food in the whole world, without being satisfied. If this minister could spend this money only food, then I think you might suffer from the same disease. These are just a few examples; The list goes on and on, from country to country. It is time we opened our minds eye, and finding solutions to this problem.

Indeed, Gordon Brown & # 39; Iceland's government led during the economic crisis period of 2008-2011. According to the Guardian, "Gordon Brown said that the world's media that Iceland is virtually bankrupt, which was not true. He referred to the Anti-Terrorism Act (2001) to freeze all Icelandic assets in the UK." (The Guardian, 2009). This led to the business men and women in Iceland was able to retrieve their assets to British banks were trading. The report also said that the president forced each municipality in the country to open accounts and commercial banks that require high taxes, which in most business men and women to go bankrupt while their assets were frozen in the United Kingdom. I think Gordon Brown was chosen deliberately to take care of the country and also to the citizens. But if you can not do this job if he increases the troubles of citizens like this ?, What did they do to deserve this punishment?

innocent civilians suffer in the hands of these "politricsters," and I feel sad for my citizens. God should save us from these people. Never mind that I do not hate them, I hate the characters. How long do managers continue to play the clueless us and lead crises beloved country? It & # 39; and the time that was together and make wise decisions.

They say that the development of a country, and also to the citizens depends so much on the leaders. In a sense, it means you are not good leaders, the development of a country is a serious impediment, and the country is in crisis. They all get involved and can not be bored in an attempt to eliminate these "conscientious" people in our management. Let us be wise during the campaign and not to be deceived by the word "sweet" to use such "politricians", but try to look at the background of each candidate and a wise decision to choose the best man to lead us. We also recommend you use formal means hold these leaders accountable, and a detailed report on how to compile and use of state property. If we do, I believe we will create a society in which we all live peacefully enjoy the benefit of state assets, and countries are also better for the current generation and future generations.

Source by Emmanuel Adutwum

When the policy is a personal career

Published by:

To give a simple definition of a career politician who makes politics his / her main source of his / her income – & # 39; s bread and butter for the survival of the family, genus, or a dependent.

This is the image of the modern Philippine politics, where the vast majority who are currently holding elected posts in politics you step into a profitable, lucrative business.

I can see the notion of politics ROI or "return on investment." No wonder that aspiring managers are willing to spend a lot of money in the elections, because the back of their minds they hope an ROI if you ever elected.

If the policy is regarded as a career? No, it can not be. Because when you look at that way, the noble and the real motive for seeking public position is lost forever. To make the policy a & # 39; s personal career, to disarm the public. As we all know, public confidence in the civil service, and this is a personal choice of a person who thinks that the skills, education, training and a willingness to humans, and initiate positive change in the community.

What happens when politics becomes a career politicians? In other areas, the profession whose professional career is a challenging opportunity as not to excel at all times, innovate, and improve your skills in order to be recognized among others. That good at what you do will certainly be beneficial to the community. In other words, a truly commendable career outside politics.

Not so when politics becomes a career to one. This is useful for society? The obvious answer is no. It is only beneficial who makes a career in politics. By making politics a source of income, the politicians have lost touch with reality. His decision was motivated by money now. He just wants to enrich himself. He wants to accumulate wealth at the expense of more substantive common good. The idea is to serve people in remote or the politician who has a career in politics. In the end, people are suffering, programs and projects aimed at the components that are used as channels of personal income.

This is precisely the reason why traditional politicians (trap) can not and should not completely abandon the policy after the end of their term. After realizing that there is so much money to get out of politics, they become obsessed with staying in power forever, which is essential for the survival of the bank. In their minds, they think that you are in politics not have to work hard to ensure that the food on the table. In our language, it aptly, "Dawat-limpyo." How convenient.

If you look at one of the root causes of poverty in the nation, this is due to the fact that politicians only career in politics. The wealth of the nation is no longer goes to the general population, but the few who were lording over us. What is the purpose of the people go to their pockets. Consequently, poverty is a cancer, it is almost impossible to cure the same brand of political leadership today.

If you also look at the seemingly endless political violence aggravating months before the election, we will come to a tactile concluded that career politicians They are blamed. Why would a person kills his neighbor, if all you want is to serve the public? Well, a politician killed another politician, because he thinks the other a threat to the financial survival, a threat to your bank account. It fears that if he is no longer in public office, could not be more food on the table.

looks like us, are infected with career politicians in our province.

Source by Stan Debohol